Fontbakery Technical Report

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f 

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed Light' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed ExtraBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans ExtraBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed Thin' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed Thin' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Bold Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed ExtraBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed Light' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- NULL

- ampersand.001

- ijacute 

- uni030C.alt

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- IJacute

- ijacute

- uni019B.sc 

- uni01BA.sc

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2 

- Glyph name: uni0249	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

[code: contour-count]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

Space and non-breaking space have differing width: The space glyph named space is 227 font units wide, non-breaking space named (uni00A0) is 228 font units wide, and both should be positive and the same. GlyphsApp has "Sidebearing arithmetic" (https://glyphsapp.com/tutorials/spacing) which allows you to set the non-breaking space width to always equal the space width. [code: different-widths]

2 different Font Family names were found:

• 'Ubuntu Sans' was found in:

  • UbuntuSans-ExtraLightItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-SemiBold.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-Thin.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-ThinItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-LightItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-Bold.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSans-BoldItalic.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSans-Italic.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSans-MediumItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-Regular.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSans-ExtraBold.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-ExtraLight.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-Medium.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-SemiBoldItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSans-Light.ttf (nameID 16)

• 'Ubuntu Sans Condensed' was found in:

  • UbuntuSansCondensed-MediumItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-LightItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-ExtraLightItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-Regular.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-Medium.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-SemiBoldItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-ExtraBold.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-Thin.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-ThinItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-Italic.ttf (nameID 1)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-ExtraLight.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-SemiBold.ttf (nameID 16)
  • UbuntuSansCondensed-Light.ttf (nameID 16) [code: inconsistent-family-name]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<680.0,134.5>-<691.0,123.0>-<711.0,123.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<9.0,779.0>--<24.0,779.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<257.0,288.0>--<257.0,284.0>>

* questiondown (U+00BF) contains a short segment B<<195.0,270.0>-<195.0,274.0>-<195.0,280.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<408.0,-14.0>-<405.0,-20.0>-<402.5,-26.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<402.5,-26.0>-<400.0,-32.0>-<397.0,-38.0>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<326.0,-12.0>-<323.0,-19.0>-<319.5,-25.5>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<319.5,-25.5>-<316.0,-32.0>-<314.0,-38.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<508.0,-122.0>-<517.0,-122.0>-<528.5,-120.5>>

* eogonek (U+0119) contains a short segment B<<351.0,-10.0>-<343.0,-11.0>-<334.0,-11.5>> 

* 89 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<249.0,727.0>--<241.0,727.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<249.0,-185.0>--<241.0,-185.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,-128.0>--<14.0,-128.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,783.0>--<14.0,783.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<188.0,308.0>--<188.0,300.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<365.0,-141.0>-<373.0,-141.0>-<382.0,-140.0>>

* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment B<<330.0,-120.0>-<338.0,-123.0>-<349.5,-124.5>>

* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment B<<349.5,-124.5>-<361.0,-126.0>-<370.0,-126.0>>

* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment B<<237.0,-125.0>-<245.0,-128.0>-<254.0,-129.0>>

* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment B<<254.0,-129.0>-<263.0,-130.0>-<270.0,-130.0>> 

* 54 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<688.5,136.0>-<699.0,126.0>-<718.0,126.0>>

* R (U+0052) contains a short segment B<<318.0,260.0>-<311.0,259.0>-<304.0,259.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<266.0,281.0>--<266.0,279.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<419.0,-13.0>-<416.0,-20.0>-<413.0,-26.5>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<413.0,-26.5>-<410.0,-33.0>-<408.0,-39.0>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<332.0,-12.0>-<329.0,-19.0>-<326.0,-26.0>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<326.0,-26.0>-<323.0,-33.0>-<321.0,-39.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<517.0,-118.0>-<526.0,-118.0>-<538.0,-116.5>>

* eogonek (U+0119) contains a short segment B<<348.0,-12.0>-<341.0,-13.0>-<334.0,-13.0>>

* eogonek (U+0119) contains a short segment B<<334.0,-13.0>-<327.0,-13.0>-<320.0,-13.0>> 

* 79 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<261.0,710.0>--<255.0,710.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<261.0,-185.0>--<255.0,-185.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,-111.0>--<12.0,-111.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,783.0>--<12.0,783.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<200.0,300.0>--<200.0,292.0>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<38.0,432.0>-<38.0,435.0>-<38.0,438.0>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<38.0,438.0>-<38.0,441.0>-<38.0,444.0>>

* onehalf (U+00BD) contains a short segment B<<480.0,0.0>-<480.0,3.0>-<480.0,6.0>>

* onehalf (U+00BD) contains a short segment B<<480.0,6.0>-<480.0,9.0>-<480.0,12.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<322.0,-11.0>-<318.0,-18.0>-<315.0,-25.5>> 

* 66 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<631.0,119.0>-<643.0,119.0>-<654.5,126.5>>

* G (U+0047) contains a short segment B<<325.0,96.0>-<331.0,96.0>-<338.5,97.0>>

* G (U+0047) contains a short segment B<<338.5,97.0>-<346.0,98.0>-<353.0,100.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<276.0,689.0>--<274.0,689.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<276.0,-184.0>--<274.0,-184.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<7.0,-90.0>--<9.0,-90.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<7.0,783.0>--<9.0,783.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<215.0,289.0>--<215.0,281.0>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<33.0,429.0>-<32.0,432.0>-<32.0,435.5>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<32.0,435.5>-<32.0,439.0>-<32.0,442.0>> 

* 89 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<644.0,185.0>-<642.0,179.0>-<641.5,174.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<641.5,174.0>-<641.0,169.0>-<641.0,164.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<281.0,-19.0>-<281.0,-17.0>-<281.0,-14.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<281.0,-14.0>-<281.0,-11.0>-<281.0,-8.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<410.0,-7.0>-<409.0,-11.0>-<409.0,-14.0>>

* m (U+006D) contains a short segment B<<512.0,397.0>-<514.0,388.0>-<514.5,379.5>>

* m (U+006D) contains a short segment B<<514.5,379.5>-<515.0,371.0>-<515.0,363.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<348.0,-14.0>-<342.0,-22.0>-<337.0,-29.5>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<337.0,-29.5>-<332.0,-37.0>-<329.0,-43.0>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<266.0,-29.0>-<261.0,-37.0>-<258.0,-43.0>> 

* 81 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* nine (U+0039) contains a short segment B<<51.0,-2.0>-<47.0,-2.0>-<39.0,-2.0>>

* nine (U+0039) contains a short segment B<<39.0,-2.0>-<31.0,-2.0>-<24.0,-1.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<621.0,179.0>-<620.0,171.0>-<617.0,162.5>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<617.0,162.5>-<614.0,154.0>-<614.0,146.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<614.0,146.0>-<614.0,136.0>-<621.0,126.5>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<291.0,-36.0>-<291.0,-31.0>-<291.5,-25.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<291.5,-25.0>-<292.0,-19.0>-<293.0,-12.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<368.0,-12.0>-<365.0,-21.0>-<365.0,-28.0>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<230.5,-26.5>-<226.0,-34.0>-<223.0,-39.0>>

* Aogonek (U+0104) contains a short segment B<<528.0,-130.0>-<537.0,-128.0>-<544.0,-127.0>> 

* 80 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* nine (U+0039) contains a short segment B<<52.0,-3.0>-<47.0,-3.0>-<38.0,-2.5>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<631.0,182.0>-<629.0,174.0>-<627.5,167.5>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<627.5,167.5>-<626.0,161.0>-<626.0,154.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<626.0,154.0>-<626.0,141.0>-<634.0,132.5>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<634.0,132.5>-<642.0,124.0>-<667.0,124.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<286.0,-29.0>-<286.0,-25.0>-<286.5,-20.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<286.5,-20.0>-<287.0,-15.0>-<288.0,-10.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<386.0,-10.0>-<384.0,-17.0>-<384.0,-22.0>>

* m (U+006D) contains a short segment B<<487.0,409.0>-<489.0,398.0>-<490.0,387.0>>

* m (U+006D) contains a short segment B<<490.0,387.0>-<491.0,376.0>-<491.0,365.0>> 

* 79 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* question (U+003F) contains a short segment B<<230.0,242.0>-<230.0,241.0>-<230.0,233.5>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<636.0,123.0>-<647.0,123.0>-<657.0,130.5>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<657.0,130.5>-<667.0,138.0>-<675.5,159.5>>

* G (U+0047) contains a short segment B<<329.0,110.0>-<333.0,110.0>-<337.0,110.0>>

* G (U+0047) contains a short segment B<<337.0,110.0>-<341.0,110.0>-<345.0,111.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<224.0,282.0>--<224.0,274.0>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<29.0,427.0>-<28.0,430.0>-<28.0,433.5>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<28.0,433.5>-<28.0,437.0>-<28.0,441.0>>

* onehalf (U+00BD) contains a short segment B<<484.0,0.0>-<483.0,3.0>-<483.0,6.5>>

* onehalf (U+00BD) contains a short segment B<<483.0,6.5>-<483.0,10.0>-<483.0,14.0>> 

* 75 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<688.0,169.0>-<688.0,146.0>-<697.5,138.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<697.5,138.0>-<707.0,130.0>-<725.0,130.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<432.0,-13.0>-<429.0,-20.0>-<426.0,-26.5>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<426.0,-26.5>-<423.0,-33.0>-<420.0,-40.0>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<340.0,-13.0>-<337.0,-20.0>-<334.0,-26.5>>

* ccedilla (U+00E7) contains a short segment B<<334.0,-26.5>-<331.0,-33.0>-<328.0,-40.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<498.0,-88.0>-<498.0,-99.0>-<504.5,-106.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<528.0,-113.0>-<537.0,-113.0>-<549.5,-111.5>>

* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment B<<412.0,-53.0>-<427.0,-58.0>-<436.5,-59.5>>

* Scedilla (U+015E) contains a short segment B<<338.0,-10.0>-<334.0,-18.0>-<330.0,-25.5>> 

* 73 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<229.0,754.0>--<217.0,754.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<229.0,-185.0>--<217.0,-185.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,-156.0>--<18.0,-156.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,783.0>--<18.0,783.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<155.0,322.0>--<155.0,313.0>>

* Aogonek (U+0104) contains a short segment B<<399.0,-158.0>-<407.0,-158.0>-<415.0,-157.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<336.0,-158.0>-<344.0,-158.0>-<352.0,-157.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<352.0,-157.0>-<360.0,-156.0>-<370.0,-153.0>>

* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment B<<378.0,-187.0>-<368.0,-187.0>-<353.0,-184.5>>

* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment B<<353.0,-184.5>-<338.0,-182.0>-<329.0,-178.0>> 

* 84 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<638.0,183.0>-<636.0,177.0>-<634.5,171.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<634.5,171.0>-<633.0,165.0>-<633.0,159.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<633.0,159.0>-<633.0,145.0>-<642.0,136.5>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<642.0,136.5>-<651.0,128.0>-<674.0,128.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<283.0,-24.0>-<283.0,-21.0>-<283.5,-17.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<283.5,-17.0>-<284.0,-13.0>-<284.0,-9.0>>

* Q (U+0051) contains a short segment B<<398.0,-9.0>-<397.0,-14.0>-<397.0,-18.0>>

* m (U+006D) contains a short segment B<<499.0,403.0>-<502.0,393.0>-<502.5,383.5>>

* m (U+006D) contains a short segment B<<502.5,383.5>-<503.0,374.0>-<503.0,364.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<346.0,-14.0>-<341.0,-22.0>-<336.0,-29.0>> 

* 89 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<70.0,0.0>-<70.0,4.0>-<70.0,9.5>>

* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<70.0,9.5>-<70.0,15.0>-<70.0,19.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<236.0,745.0>--<225.0,745.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<236.0,-185.0>--<225.0,-185.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,-147.0>--<17.0,-147.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,783.0>--<17.0,783.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<166.0,317.0>--<166.0,309.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<302.0,-9.0>-<295.0,-9.0>-<292.0,-9.0>>

* Aogonek (U+0104) contains a short segment B<<409.0,-152.0>-<416.0,-152.0>-<425.0,-151.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<346.0,-152.0>-<353.0,-152.0>-<362.0,-151.0>> 

* 66 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<47.0,0.0>-<47.0,5.0>-<47.0,10.0>>

* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<47.0,10.0>-<47.0,15.0>-<47.0,19.0>>

* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<626.0,115.0>-<640.0,115.0>-<652.0,123.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<268.0,700.0>--<265.0,700.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<268.0,-184.0>--<265.0,-184.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<7.0,-101.0>--<10.0,-101.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<7.0,783.0>--<10.0,783.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<207.0,294.0>--<207.0,286.0>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<35.0,430.0>-<35.0,433.0>-<35.0,436.5>>

* uni00B2 (U+00B2) contains a short segment B<<35.0,436.5>-<35.0,440.0>-<35.0,443.0>> 

* 63 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:

* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<66.0,0.0>-<66.0,5.0>-<66.0,10.0>>

* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<66.0,10.0>-<66.0,15.0>-<66.0,19.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<242.0,736.0>--<233.0,736.0>>

* braceleft (U+007B) contains a short segment L<<242.0,-185.0>--<233.0,-185.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,-137.0>--<15.0,-137.0>>

* braceright (U+007D) contains a short segment L<<6.0,783.0>--<15.0,783.0>>

* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<177.0,313.0>--<177.0,304.0>>

* Ccedilla (U+00C7) contains a short segment B<<308.0,-10.0>-<303.0,-10.0>-<300.0,-10.0>>

* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<355.0,-147.0>-<363.0,-147.0>-<372.0,-145.5>>

* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment B<<331.0,-130.0>-<340.0,-133.0>-<351.5,-134.5>> 

* 63 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<100.0,358.0>--<296.0,169.0>> -> L<<296.0,169.0>--<300.0,165.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<300.0,165.0>--<304.0,169.0>> -> L<<304.0,169.0>--<680.0,580.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<112.0,372.0>--<251.0,203.0>> -> L<<251.0,203.0>--<256.0,196.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<256.0,196.0>--<261.0,203.0>> -> L<<261.0,203.0>--<540.0,588.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,207.0>--<276.0,221.0>> -> L<<276.0,221.0>--<618.0,601.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<88.0,386.0>--<252.0,221.0>> -> L<<252.0,221.0>--<264.0,207.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,162.0>--<268.0,166.0>> -> L<<268.0,166.0>--<652.0,586.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<56.0,362.0>--<260.0,166.0>> -> L<<260.0,166.0>--<264.0,162.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<305.0,162.0>--<309.0,166.0>> -> L<<309.0,166.0>--<693.0,586.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<97.0,362.0>--<301.0,166.0>> -> L<<301.0,166.0>--<305.0,162.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<251.0,166.0>--<254.0,171.0>> -> L<<254.0,171.0>--<544.0,573.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<251.0,162.0>--<255.0,167.0>> -> L<<255.0,167.0>--<550.0,580.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<99.0,357.0>--<247.0,167.0>> -> L<<247.0,167.0>--<251.0,162.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<104.0,353.0>--<292.0,171.0>> -> L<<292.0,171.0>--<296.0,167.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<296.0,167.0>--<300.0,171.0>> -> L<<300.0,171.0>--<666.0,573.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<234.0,171.0>--<237.0,175.0>> -> L<<237.0,175.0>--<520.0,567.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<88.0,349.0>--<231.0,175.0>> -> L<<231.0,175.0>--<234.0,171.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,222.0>--<279.0,240.0>> -> L<<279.0,240.0>--<615.0,615.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<91.0,401.0>--<249.0,239.0>> -> L<<249.0,239.0>--<264.0,222.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<232.0,196.0>--<237.0,203.0>> -> L<<237.0,203.0>--<516.0,588.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<89.0,372.0>--<227.0,203.0>> -> L<<227.0,203.0>--<232.0,196.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<117.0,387.0>--<252.0,221.0>> -> L<<252.0,221.0>--<259.0,212.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<259.0,212.0>--<265.0,221.0>> -> L<<265.0,221.0>--<541.0,601.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<230.0,229.0>--<238.0,240.0>> -> L<<238.0,240.0>--<512.0,615.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni044D (U+044D): L<<139.0,315.0>--<329.0,315.0>> -> L<<329.0,315.0>--<329.0,315.0>>

* uni04ED (U+04ED): L<<139.0,315.0>--<329.0,315.0>> -> L<<329.0,315.0>--<329.0,315.0>>

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<120.0,401.0>--<278.0,239.0>> -> L<<278.0,239.0>--<293.0,222.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<293.0,222.0>--<308.0,240.0>> -> L<<308.0,240.0>--<644.0,615.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<107.0,349.0>--<287.0,174.0>> -> L<<287.0,174.0>--<291.0,170.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<291.0,170.0>--<295.0,174.0>> -> L<<295.0,174.0>--<653.0,567.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni044D (U+044D): L<<125.0,305.0>--<330.0,305.0>> -> L<<330.0,305.0>--<330.0,305.0>>

* uni04ED (U+04ED): L<<125.0,305.0>--<330.0,305.0>> -> L<<330.0,305.0>--<330.0,305.0>>

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<113.0,371.0>--<283.0,202.0>> -> L<<283.0,202.0>--<292.0,192.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<292.0,192.0>--<301.0,203.0>> -> L<<301.0,203.0>--<649.0,588.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<229.0,248.0>--<238.0,261.0>> -> L<<238.0,261.0>--<509.0,631.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<91.0,419.0>--<220.0,261.0>> -> L<<220.0,261.0>--<229.0,248.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,170.0>--<268.0,174.0>> -> L<<268.0,174.0>--<626.0,567.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<80.0,349.0>--<260.0,174.0>> -> L<<260.0,174.0>--<264.0,170.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,239.0>--<282.0,262.0>> -> L<<282.0,262.0>--<611.0,631.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<94.0,418.0>--<245.0,261.0>> -> L<<245.0,261.0>--<264.0,239.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,165.0>--<268.0,169.0>> -> L<<268.0,169.0>--<643.0,580.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<64.0,358.0>--<260.0,169.0>> -> L<<260.0,169.0>--<264.0,165.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<230.0,157.0>--<234.0,163.0>> -> L<<234.0,163.0>--<536.0,586.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<75.0,361.0>--<226.0,163.0>> -> L<<226.0,163.0>--<230.0,157.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<251.0,157.0>--<255.0,163.0>> -> L<<255.0,163.0>--<557.0,586.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<96.0,361.0>--<247.0,163.0>> -> L<<247.0,163.0>--<251.0,157.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,192.0>--<273.0,203.0>> -> L<<273.0,203.0>--<621.0,588.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<85.0,371.0>--<255.0,202.0>> -> L<<255.0,202.0>--<264.0,192.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni044D (U+044D): L<<132.0,310.0>--<329.0,310.0>> -> L<<329.0,310.0>--<329.0,310.0>>

* uni04ED (U+04ED): L<<132.0,310.0>--<329.0,310.0>> -> L<<329.0,310.0>--<329.0,310.0>>

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<116.0,386.0>--<281.0,221.0>> -> L<<281.0,221.0>--<293.0,207.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<293.0,207.0>--<304.0,221.0>> -> L<<304.0,221.0>--<647.0,601.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<124.0,418.0>--<275.0,261.0>> -> L<<275.0,261.0>--<294.0,239.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<294.0,239.0>--<312.0,262.0>> -> L<<312.0,262.0>--<641.0,631.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<122.0,402.0>--<254.0,240.0>> -> L<<254.0,240.0>--<262.0,229.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<262.0,229.0>--<269.0,240.0>> -> L<<269.0,240.0>--<543.0,615.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<105.0,349.0>--<248.0,175.0>> -> L<<248.0,175.0>--<251.0,171.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<251.0,171.0>--<254.0,175.0>> -> L<<254.0,175.0>--<537.0,567.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<127.0,419.0>--<256.0,261.0>> -> L<<256.0,261.0>--<265.0,248.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<265.0,248.0>--<274.0,261.0>> -> L<<274.0,261.0>--<545.0,631.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<231.0,162.0>--<235.0,167.0>> -> L<<235.0,167.0>--<531.0,580.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<231.0,212.0>--<238.0,221.0>> -> L<<238.0,221.0>--<514.0,601.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<90.0,387.0>--<225.0,221.0>> -> L<<225.0,221.0>--<231.0,212.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<264.0,167.0>--<268.0,171.0>> -> L<<268.0,171.0>--<635.0,573.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<72.0,353.0>--<260.0,171.0>> -> L<<260.0,171.0>--<264.0,167.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have colinear vectors:

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<233.0,166.0>--<236.0,171.0>> -> L<<236.0,171.0>--<525.0,573.0>> 

* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<84.0,353.0>--<229.0,171.0>> -> L<<229.0,171.0>--<233.0,166.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni01EB (U+01EB): B<<243.0,-116.0>-<243.0,-62.0>-<313.0,-5.0>>/B<<313.0,-5.0>-<311.0,-6.0>-<306.0,-6.5>> = 12.590382945535127 

* uni01ED (U+01ED): B<<243.0,-116.0>-<243.0,-62.0>-<313.0,-5.0>>/B<<313.0,-5.0>-<311.0,-6.0>-<306.0,-6.5>> = 12.590382945535127 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni00B5 (U+00B5): B<<112.5,22.0>-<78.0,50.0>-<76.0,93.0>>/B<<76.0,93.0>-<72.0,70.0>-<69.5,52.5>> = 12.528807709151492

* uni023F (U+023F): B<<239.5,-151.5>-<249.0,-150.0>-<250.0,-147.0>>/L<<250.0,-147.0>--<244.0,-181.0>> = 8.426969021480636 

* uni03BC (U+03BC): B<<112.5,22.0>-<78.0,50.0>-<76.0,93.0>>/B<<76.0,93.0>-<72.0,70.0>-<69.5,52.5>> = 12.528807709151492 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni01EB (U+01EB): B<<255.5,-61.0>-<273.0,-34.0>-<305.0,-7.0>>/B<<305.0,-7.0>-<303.0,-8.0>-<299.5,-8.5>> = 13.590948447841294 

* uni01ED (U+01ED): B<<255.5,-61.0>-<273.0,-34.0>-<305.0,-7.0>>/B<<305.0,-7.0>-<303.0,-8.0>-<299.5,-8.5>> = 13.590948447841294 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni01EA (U+01EA): B<<218.0,-130.0>-<218.0,-68.0>-<306.0,-10.0>>/B<<306.0,-10.0>-<304.0,-11.0>-<300.0,-11.0>> = 6.823462399033457 

* uni01EC (U+01EC): B<<218.0,-130.0>-<218.0,-68.0>-<306.0,-10.0>>/B<<306.0,-10.0>-<304.0,-11.0>-<300.0,-11.0>> = 6.823462399033457 [code: found-jaggy-segments]

The following glyphs have jaggy segments:

* uni01EA (U+01EA): B<<169.5,-63.5>-<189.0,-36.0>-<225.0,-9.0>>/B<<225.0,-9.0>-<224.0,-10.0>-<221.0,-10.0>> = 8.13010235415596 

* uni01EC (U+01EC): B<<169.5,-63.5>-<189.0,-36.0>-<225.0,-9.0>>/B<<225.0,-9.0>-<224.0,-10.0>-<221.0,-10.0>> = 8.13010235415596 [code: found-jaggy-segments]