| 💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 44 | 85 | 1344 | 67 | 996 |
| 0% | 2% | 4% | 67% | 3% | 50% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
The Ubuntu Font License is only acceptable on the Google Fonts collection for legacy font families that already adopted such license. New Families should use eigther Apache or Open Font License. [code: ufl]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright 2011, 2022, 2023 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0" [code: bad-notice-format]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Mono Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Mono ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Mono SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Italic'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Mono Medium' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Mono Thin' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Mono SemiBold' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries: FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Ubuntu Sans Mono Light' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'
Please take a look at the conversation at https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
Current Font Bakery version is 0.8.13, while a newer 0.11.2 is already available. Please upgrade it with 'pip install -U fontbakery' [code: outdated-fontbakery]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- IJacute
- ijacute
- uni030C.alt
- uni256A.001
- uni256B.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni01C4 Contours detected: 5 Expected: 4
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni01C4 Contours detected: 5 Expected: 4
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: i Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: igrave Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: iacute Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: icircumflex Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: idieresis Contours detected: 4 Expected: 3
- Glyph name: itilde Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: imacron Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ibreve Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: dotlessi Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uni01D0 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- 68 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni01C4 Contours detected: 5 Expected: 4
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni01C4 Contours detected: 5 Expected: 4
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: dkshade Contours detected: 61 Expected: 73
- Glyph name: ltshade Contours detected: 36 Expected: 46
- Glyph name: shade Contours detected: 72 Expected: 85
- Glyph name: uni0249 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1340 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1339 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1340 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1340 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1339 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1340 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1339 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1339 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1339 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1339 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The PANOSE numbers are incorrect for a monospaced font. Note: Family Type is set to 0, which does not seem right. [code: mono-bad-panose]
The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 1339 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]
The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: tonos.cap (unencoded) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: tonos.cap (unencoded) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: tonos.cap (unencoded) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: tonos.cap (unencoded) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: tonos.cap (unencoded) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: tonos.cap (unencoded) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: tonos.cap (unencoded) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<98.0,0.0>-<97.0,8.0>-<97.0,12.0>>
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<97.0,12.0>-<97.0,16.0>-<97.0,21.0>>
* three (U+0033) contains a short segment L<<206.0,392.0>--<223.0,392.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<411.0,475.0>-<424.0,475.0>-<434.5,474.0>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<434.5,474.0>-<445.0,473.0>-<457.0,470.0>>
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<206.0,316.0>--<206.0,305.0>>
* onehalf (U+00BD) contains a short segment B<<321.0,9.0>-<321.0,16.0>-<321.0,17.0>>
* ae (U+00E6) contains a short segment B<<531.5,262.5>-<531.0,256.0>-<531.0,251.0>>
* eogonek (U+0119) contains a short segment B<<500.0,285.0>-<500.0,278.0>-<499.5,269.5>>
* eogonek (U+0119) contains a short segment B<<499.5,269.5>-<499.0,261.0>-<498.0,253.0>>
* 85 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<106.0,0.0>-<105.0,9.0>-<105.0,14.0>>
* two (U+0032) contains a short segment B<<105.0,14.0>-<105.0,19.0>-<105.0,24.0>>
* three (U+0033) contains a short segment L<<211.0,386.0>--<222.0,386.0>>
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment L<<196.0,321.0>--<196.0,311.0>>
* ae (U+00E6) contains a short segment B<<531.5,267.5>-<531.0,261.0>-<531.0,256.0>>
* Aogonek (U+0104) contains a short segment B<<515.0,-159.0>-<522.0,-159.0>-<530.0,-157.5>>
* aogonek (U+0105) contains a short segment B<<431.0,-155.0>-<438.0,-155.0>-<446.0,-153.5>>
* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<463.0,-155.0>-<470.0,-155.0>-<478.0,-153.5>>
* Eogonek (U+0118) contains a short segment B<<478.0,-153.5>-<486.0,-152.0>-<496.0,-150.0>>
* eogonek (U+0119) contains a short segment B<<413.0,-155.0>-<420.0,-155.0>-<428.0,-153.5>>
* 67 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<152.0,468.0>--<114.0,282.0>> -> L<<114.0,282.0>--<46.0,0.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<222.0,238.0>--<259.0,424.0>> -> L<<259.0,424.0>--<324.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<163.0,468.0>--<123.0,280.0>> -> L<<123.0,280.0>--<56.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<232.0,238.0>--<269.0,419.0>> -> L<<269.0,419.0>--<335.0,693.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<266.0,125.0>--<259.0,250.0>> -> L<<259.0,250.0>--<259.0,693.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<91.0,580.0>--<97.0,446.0>> -> L<<97.0,446.0>--<97.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<273.0,125.0>--<266.0,253.0>> -> L<<266.0,253.0>--<266.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<98.0,580.0>--<105.0,444.0>> -> L<<105.0,444.0>--<105.0,0.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<260.0,121.0>--<253.0,253.0>> -> L<<253.0,253.0>--<253.0,693.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<88.0,584.0>--<94.0,446.0>> -> L<<94.0,446.0>--<94.0,0.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<145.0,502.0>--<106.0,280.0>> -> L<<106.0,280.0>--<38.0,0.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<233.0,180.0>--<272.0,400.0>> -> L<<272.0,400.0>--<343.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<155.0,502.0>--<116.0,282.0>> -> L<<116.0,282.0>--<48.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<243.0,180.0>--<283.0,403.0>> -> L<<283.0,403.0>--<354.0,693.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<155.0,454.0>--<117.0,282.0>> -> L<<117.0,282.0>--<49.0,0.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<217.0,263.0>--<254.0,434.0>> -> L<<254.0,434.0>--<317.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<166.0,454.0>--<126.0,280.0>> -> L<<126.0,280.0>--<59.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<227.0,263.0>--<263.0,425.0>> -> L<<263.0,425.0>--<327.0,693.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<108.0,468.0>--<113.0,269.0>> -> L<<113.0,269.0>--<113.0,0.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<232.0,238.0>--<225.0,429.0>> -> L<<225.0,429.0>--<225.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<108.0,468.0>--<113.0,281.0>> -> L<<113.0,281.0>--<113.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<232.0,238.0>--<225.0,415.0>> -> L<<225.0,415.0>--<225.0,693.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<105.0,452.0>--<111.0,270.0>> -> L<<111.0,270.0>--<111.0,0.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<230.0,255.0>--<224.0,418.0>> -> L<<224.0,418.0>--<224.0,693.0>>
* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<205.0,226.0>--<217.0,243.0>> -> L<<217.0,243.0>--<485.0,602.0>>
* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<83.0,383.0>--<193.0,243.0>> -> L<<193.0,243.0>--<205.0,226.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<158.0,440.0>--<120.0,283.0>> -> L<<120.0,283.0>--<52.0,0.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<212.0,287.0>--<249.0,444.0>> -> L<<249.0,444.0>--<309.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<169.0,440.0>--<129.0,279.0>> -> L<<129.0,279.0>--<62.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<222.0,287.0>--<257.0,432.0>> -> L<<257.0,432.0>--<319.0,693.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<269.0,98.0>--<266.0,177.0>> -> L<<266.0,177.0>--<266.0,693.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<89.0,619.0>--<92.0,525.0>> -> L<<92.0,525.0>--<92.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<100.0,619.0>--<103.0,525.0>> -> L<<103.0,525.0>--<103.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<280.0,98.0>--<277.0,177.0>> -> L<<277.0,177.0>--<277.0,693.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<259.0,98.0>--<256.0,177.0>> -> L<<256.0,177.0>--<256.0,693.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<84.0,619.0>--<87.0,525.0>> -> L<<87.0,525.0>--<87.0,0.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<113.0,454.0>--<116.0,261.0>> -> L<<116.0,261.0>--<116.0,0.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<221.0,263.0>--<217.0,442.0>> -> L<<217.0,442.0>--<217.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<113.0,454.0>--<116.0,281.0>> -> L<<116.0,281.0>--<116.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<221.0,263.0>--<217.0,419.0>> -> L<<217.0,419.0>--<217.0,693.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<108.0,426.0>--<111.0,263.0>> -> L<<111.0,263.0>--<111.0,0.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<218.0,291.0>--<215.0,423.0>> -> L<<215.0,423.0>--<215.0,693.0>>
* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<204.0,242.0>--<219.0,265.0>> -> L<<219.0,265.0>--<480.0,616.0>>
* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<85.0,398.0>--<189.0,264.0>> -> L<<189.0,264.0>--<204.0,242.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<203.0,258.0>--<221.0,287.0>> -> L<<221.0,287.0>--<474.0,631.0>>
* uni2713 (U+2713): L<<88.0,412.0>--<184.0,286.0>> -> L<<184.0,286.0>--<203.0,258.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<263.0,153.0>--<252.0,323.0>> -> L<<252.0,323.0>--<252.0,693.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<93.0,541.0>--<103.0,368.0>> -> L<<103.0,368.0>--<103.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<267.0,153.0>--<256.0,330.0>> -> L<<256.0,330.0>--<256.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<97.0,541.0>--<106.0,362.0>> -> L<<106.0,362.0>--<106.0,0.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<260.0,145.0>--<250.0,329.0>> -> L<<250.0,329.0>--<250.0,693.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<92.0,549.0>--<102.0,368.0>> -> L<<102.0,368.0>--<102.0,0.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have colinear vectors:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<260.0,180.0>--<245.0,396.0>> -> L<<245.0,396.0>--<245.0,693.0>>
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<95.0,502.0>--<108.0,289.0>> -> L<<108.0,289.0>--<108.0,0.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<260.0,180.0>--<245.0,406.0>> -> L<<245.0,406.0>--<245.0,693.0>>
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<95.0,502.0>--<108.0,281.0>> -> L<<108.0,281.0>--<108.0,0.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<261.0,168.0>--<247.0,405.0>> -> L<<247.0,405.0>--<247.0,693.0>>
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<96.0,514.0>--<109.0,289.0>> -> L<<109.0,289.0>--<109.0,0.0>> [code: found-colinear-vectors]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<154.0,308.0>-<153.0,383.0>-<152.0,468.0>>/L<<152.0,468.0>--<114.0,282.0>> = 12.220727443911795
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<209.0,693.0>--<222.0,238.0>>/L<<222.0,238.0>--<259.0,424.0>> = 12.887258472111856
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<164.5,308.0>-<163.0,383.0>-<163.0,468.0>>/L<<163.0,468.0>--<123.0,280.0>> = 12.01147838636543
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<219.0,693.0>--<232.0,238.0>>/L<<232.0,238.0>--<269.0,419.0>> = 13.189802233901787 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<172.5,290.5>-<131.0,438.0>-<91.0,580.0>>/L<<91.0,580.0>--<97.0,446.0>> = 13.16823457364228
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<108.0,693.0>--<266.0,125.0>>/L<<266.0,125.0>--<259.0,250.0>> = 12.339703410390847
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<180.0,290.5>-<139.0,438.0>-<98.0,580.0>>/L<<98.0,580.0>--<105.0,444.0>> = 13.158694704136535
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<115.0,693.0>--<273.0,125.0>>/L<<273.0,125.0>--<266.0,253.0>> = 12.41467447918525
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<105.0,693.0>--<260.0,121.0>>/L<<260.0,121.0>--<253.0,253.0>> = 12.12627548922312
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<247.0,0.0>--<88.0,584.0>>/L<<88.0,584.0>--<94.0,446.0>> = 12.740658183940608 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* asterisk (U+002A): B<<431.0,408.0>-<463.0,376.0>-<487.0,338.0>>/L<<487.0,338.0>--<486.0,339.0>> = 12.724355685422363
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<153.0,338.0>-<150.0,424.0>-<145.0,502.0>>/L<<145.0,502.0>--<106.0,280.0>> = 13.631592245438554
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<214.0,693.0>--<233.0,180.0>>/L<<233.0,180.0>--<272.0,400.0>> = 12.173641223738318
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<163.5,338.0>-<160.0,424.0>-<155.0,502.0>>/L<<155.0,502.0>--<116.0,282.0>> = 13.720332882608297
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<224.0,693.0>--<243.0,180.0>>/L<<243.0,180.0>--<283.0,403.0>> = 12.29022473115213 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* W (U+0057): B<<183.0,419.0>-<148.0,275.0>-<114.0,138.0>>/B<<114.0,138.0>-<152.0,210.0>-<193.5,288.0>> = 13.886299175999017
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<183.0,419.0>-<148.0,275.0>-<114.0,138.0>>/B<<114.0,138.0>-<152.0,210.0>-<193.5,288.0>> = 13.886299175999017
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<183.0,419.0>-<148.0,275.0>-<114.0,138.0>>/B<<114.0,138.0>-<152.0,210.0>-<193.5,288.0>> = 13.886299175999017
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<183.0,419.0>-<148.0,275.0>-<114.0,138.0>>/B<<114.0,138.0>-<152.0,210.0>-<193.5,288.0>> = 13.886299175999017
* Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<183.0,419.0>-<148.0,275.0>-<114.0,138.0>>/B<<114.0,138.0>-<152.0,210.0>-<193.5,288.0>> = 13.886299175999017
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<154.5,295.0>-<154.0,366.0>-<155.0,454.0>>/L<<155.0,454.0>--<117.0,282.0>> = 11.807186059775386
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<206.0,693.0>--<217.0,263.0>>/L<<217.0,263.0>--<254.0,434.0>> = 13.674506148381406
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<165.0,295.0>-<165.0,366.0>-<166.0,454.0>>/L<<166.0,454.0>--<126.0,280.0>> = 12.295449135407413
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<216.0,693.0>--<227.0,263.0>>/L<<227.0,263.0>--<263.0,425.0>> = 13.994194099036692
* uni04CD (U+04CD): B<<398.5,274.0>-<433.0,417.0>-<466.0,554.0>>/L<<466.0,554.0>--<310.0,250.0>> = 13.621808414887182
* uni04CE (U+04CE): B<<370.5,185.0>-<393.0,279.0>-<414.0,373.0>>/B<<414.0,373.0>-<381.0,308.0>-<346.0,243.0>> = 14.323224660848188 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<147.5,308.0>-<128.0,383.0>-<108.0,468.0>>/L<<108.0,468.0>--<113.0,269.0>> = 11.801230287304806
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<110.0,693.0>--<232.0,238.0>>/L<<232.0,238.0>--<225.0,429.0>> = 12.910859041736162
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<147.5,308.0>-<128.0,383.0>-<108.0,468.0>>/L<<108.0,468.0>--<113.0,281.0>> = 11.708912123176166
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<110.0,693.0>--<232.0,238.0>>/L<<232.0,238.0>--<225.0,415.0>> = 12.745010426716288
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<106.0,693.0>--<230.0,255.0>>/L<<230.0,255.0>--<224.0,418.0>> = 13.698988776330973
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<229.0,0.0>--<105.0,452.0>>/L<<105.0,452.0>--<111.0,270.0>> = 13.452702757263976 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* M (U+004D): B<<417.0,272.0>-<452.0,408.0>-<486.0,544.0>>/L<<486.0,544.0>--<331.0,245.0>> = 13.365738317706885
* Mu (U+039C): B<<417.0,272.0>-<452.0,408.0>-<486.0,544.0>>/L<<486.0,544.0>--<331.0,245.0>> = 13.365738317706885
* W (U+0057): B<<189.5,421.0>-<155.0,285.0>-<120.0,149.0>>/B<<120.0,149.0>-<159.0,224.0>-<197.0,298.5>> = 13.04236869014117
* Wacute (U+1E82): B<<189.5,421.0>-<155.0,285.0>-<120.0,149.0>>/B<<120.0,149.0>-<159.0,224.0>-<197.0,298.5>> = 13.04236869014117
* Wcircumflex (U+0174): B<<189.5,421.0>-<155.0,285.0>-<120.0,149.0>>/B<<120.0,149.0>-<159.0,224.0>-<197.0,298.5>> = 13.04236869014117
* Wdieresis (U+1E84): B<<189.5,421.0>-<155.0,285.0>-<120.0,149.0>>/B<<120.0,149.0>-<159.0,224.0>-<197.0,298.5>> = 13.04236869014117
* Wgrave (U+1E80): B<<189.5,421.0>-<155.0,285.0>-<120.0,149.0>>/B<<120.0,149.0>-<159.0,224.0>-<197.0,298.5>> = 13.04236869014117
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<155.0,318.5>-<156.0,372.0>-<158.0,440.0>>/L<<158.0,440.0>--<120.0,283.0>> = 11.92141873635303
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<166.0,318.5>-<167.0,372.0>-<169.0,440.0>>/L<<169.0,440.0>--<129.0,279.0>> = 12.26779345018865
* uni041C (U+041C): B<<417.0,272.0>-<452.0,408.0>-<486.0,544.0>>/L<<486.0,544.0>--<331.0,245.0>> = 13.365738317706885
* 11 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<176.5,310.0>-<133.0,465.0>-<89.0,619.0>>/L<<89.0,619.0>--<92.0,525.0>> = 14.117427656617828
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<103.0,693.0>--<269.0,98.0>>/L<<269.0,98.0>--<266.0,177.0>> = 13.413911493807218
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<187.5,310.0>-<144.0,465.0>-<100.0,619.0>>/L<<100.0,619.0>--<103.0,525.0>> = 14.117427656617828
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<114.0,693.0>--<280.0,98.0>>/L<<280.0,98.0>--<277.0,177.0>> = 13.413911493807218
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<253.0,0.0>--<84.0,619.0>>/L<<84.0,619.0>--<87.0,525.0>> = 13.442813602023904
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<98.0,693.0>--<259.0,98.0>>/L<<259.0,98.0>--<256.0,177.0>> = 12.966239720466854 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<141.5,332.5>-<128.0,388.0>-<113.0,454.0>>/L<<113.0,454.0>--<116.0,261.0>> = 11.913729811926178
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<107.0,693.0>--<221.0,263.0>>/L<<221.0,263.0>--<217.0,442.0>> = 13.568312458572978
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<141.5,332.5>-<128.0,388.0>-<113.0,454.0>>/L<<113.0,454.0>--<116.0,281.0>> = 11.810797209004122
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<107.0,693.0>--<221.0,263.0>>/L<<221.0,263.0>--<217.0,419.0>> = 13.379651303792055
* uni04CD (U+04CD): L<<222.0,250.0>--<148.0,551.0>>/B<<148.0,551.0>-<147.0,413.0>-<146.0,271.5>> = 14.227262261099765 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* AE (U+00C6): L<<286.0,274.0>--<286.0,600.0>>/B<<286.0,600.0>-<267.0,524.0>-<247.5,445.5>> = 14.036243467926457
* AEacute (U+01FC): L<<286.0,274.0>--<286.0,600.0>>/B<<286.0,600.0>-<267.0,524.0>-<247.5,445.5>> = 14.036243467926457
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<145.0,318.5>-<133.0,372.0>-<118.0,440.0>>/L<<118.0,440.0>--<118.0,0.0>> = 12.439562018846544
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<145.0,318.5>-<133.0,372.0>-<118.0,440.0>>/L<<118.0,440.0>--<118.0,0.0>> = 12.439562018846544
* uni01E2 (U+01E2): L<<286.0,274.0>--<286.0,600.0>>/B<<286.0,600.0>-<267.0,524.0>-<247.5,445.5>> = 14.036243467926457
* uni04CD (U+04CD): L<<220.0,245.0>--<152.0,539.0>>/L<<152.0,539.0>--<152.0,0.0>> = 13.023079670604968
* uni04CD (U+04CD): L<<394.0,0.0>--<394.0,539.0>>/L<<394.0,539.0>--<319.0,245.0>> = 14.311041262606418
* uni04CE (U+04CE): B<<186.0,221.0>-<170.0,296.0>-<153.0,372.0>>/L<<153.0,372.0>--<153.0,0.0>> = 12.60860679336622
* uni04CE (U+04CE): L<<395.0,0.0>--<395.0,372.0>>/B<<395.0,372.0>-<376.0,296.0>-<357.0,221.0>> = 14.036243467926457
* uni04D4 (U+04D4): L<<286.0,274.0>--<286.0,600.0>>/B<<286.0,600.0>-<267.0,524.0>-<247.5,445.5>> = 14.036243467926457 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<169.0,271.0>-<130.0,411.0>-<93.0,541.0>>/L<<93.0,541.0>--<103.0,368.0>> = 12.5789549688919
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<112.0,693.0>--<263.0,153.0>>/L<<263.0,153.0>--<252.0,323.0>> = 11.920353801419516
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<173.0,271.0>-<134.0,411.0>-<97.0,541.0>>/L<<97.0,541.0>--<106.0,362.0>> = 13.008799003029903
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<116.0,693.0>--<267.0,153.0>>/L<<267.0,153.0>--<256.0,330.0>> = 12.06638556036382
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<113.0,693.0>--<260.0,145.0>>/L<<260.0,145.0>--<250.0,329.0>> = 11.905141078781755
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<242.0,0.0>--<92.0,549.0>>/L<<92.0,549.0>--<102.0,368.0>> = 12.11930998255544 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have jaggy segments:
* uni01CA (U+01CA): B<<141.5,338.0>-<118.0,424.0>-<95.0,502.0>>/L<<95.0,502.0>--<108.0,289.0>> = 12.936708290677316
* uni01CA (U+01CA): L<<117.0,693.0>--<260.0,180.0>>/L<<260.0,180.0>--<245.0,396.0>> = 11.603445579167502
* uni01CB (U+01CB): B<<141.5,338.0>-<118.0,424.0>-<95.0,502.0>>/L<<95.0,502.0>--<108.0,281.0>> = 13.06284078810359
* uni01CB (U+01CB): L<<117.0,693.0>--<260.0,180.0>>/L<<260.0,180.0>--<245.0,406.0>> = 11.778693639479739
* uni024A (U+024A): L<<408.0,-1.0>--<408.0,82.0>>/B<<408.0,82.0>-<398.0,41.0>-<357.0,13.0>> = 13.706961004079783
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<120.0,693.0>--<261.0,168.0>>/L<<261.0,168.0>--<247.0,405.0>> = 11.6526258660711
* uni2116 (U+2116): L<<236.0,0.0>--<96.0,514.0>>/L<<96.0,514.0>--<109.0,289.0>> = 11.929506309926724 [code: found-jaggy-segments]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* I (U+0049): L<<255.0,43.0>--<256.0,650.0>>
* I (U+0049): L<<305.0,650.0>--<304.0,43.0>>
* Iacute (U+00CD): L<<255.0,43.0>--<256.0,650.0>>
* Iacute (U+00CD): L<<305.0,650.0>--<304.0,43.0>>
* Ibreve (U+012C): L<<255.0,43.0>--<256.0,650.0>>
* Ibreve (U+012C): L<<305.0,650.0>--<304.0,43.0>>
* Icircumflex (U+00CE): L<<255.0,43.0>--<256.0,650.0>>
* Icircumflex (U+00CE): L<<305.0,650.0>--<304.0,43.0>>
* Idieresis (U+00CF): L<<255.0,43.0>--<256.0,650.0>>
* Idieresis (U+00CF): L<<305.0,650.0>--<304.0,43.0>>
* 63 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* I (U+0049): L<<262.0,31.0>--<263.0,662.0>>
* I (U+0049): L<<298.0,662.0>--<297.0,31.0>>
* Iacute (U+00CD): L<<262.0,31.0>--<263.0,662.0>>
* Iacute (U+00CD): L<<298.0,662.0>--<297.0,31.0>>
* Ibreve (U+012C): L<<262.0,31.0>--<263.0,662.0>>
* Ibreve (U+012C): L<<298.0,662.0>--<297.0,31.0>>
* Icircumflex (U+00CE): L<<262.0,31.0>--<263.0,662.0>>
* Icircumflex (U+00CE): L<<298.0,662.0>--<297.0,31.0>>
* Idieresis (U+00CF): L<<262.0,31.0>--<263.0,662.0>>
* Idieresis (U+00CF): L<<298.0,662.0>--<297.0,31.0>>
* 63 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* kgreenlandic (U+0138): L<<71.0,525.0>--<209.0,526.0>> [code: found-semi-vertical]